Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZAHX vs RGABX
FZAHX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts FZAHX vs RGABX
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opps Z
Price$233.02
Change-$0.20 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.7B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$75.54
Change-$0.05 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
FZAHX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAHX vs. RGABX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAHX is a StrongBuy and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. FZAHX (28.7B). FZAHX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . FZAHX was incepted earlier than RGABX: FZAHX (12 years) vs RGABX (23 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FZAHX (0.37). FZAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). FZAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGABX: FZAHX (0) vs RGABX (250). FZAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.60 vs. RGABX (12.81). FZAHX return over 5 years is better than : 75.95 vs. RGABX (36.01).
| FZAHX | RGABX | FZAHX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 1.39 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 1.39 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.030 | 13.731 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.7B | 329B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.60 | 12.81 | 239% |
| Returns for 3 years | 93.40 | 37.40 | 250% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.95 | 36.01 | 211% |
| Returns for 10 years | 230.29 | 72.15 | 319% |