Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZAHX vs RGABX
FZAHX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts FZAHX vs RGABX
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opps Z
Price$241.25
Change-$0.32 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.07B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$77.87
Change+$0.16 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
FZAHX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAHX vs. RGABX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAHX is a Buy and RGABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. FZAHX (30.1B). FZAHX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . FZAHX was incepted earlier than RGABX: FZAHX (12 years) vs RGABX (23 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FZAHX (0.37). FZAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). FZAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGABX: FZAHX (0) vs RGABX (250). FZAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.77 vs. RGABX (9.77). FZAHX return over 5 years is better than : 64.92 vs. RGABX (32.07).
| FZAHX | RGABX | FZAHX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 1.39 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 1.39 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.025 | 17.239 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.1B | 337B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.77 | 9.77 | 254% |
| Returns for 3 years | 137.36 | 65.96 | 208% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.92 | 32.07 | 202% |
| Returns for 10 years | 258.36 | 84.44 | 306% |