Ad is loading...
FZAHX vs RGABX
FZAHX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts FZAHX vs RGABX
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opps Z
Price$186.72
Change+$1.85 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.34B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$64.63
Change+$0.47 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
FZAHX vs RGABX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAHX vs. RGABX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAHX is a Buy and RGABX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. FZAHX (22.3B). FZAHX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . FZAHX was incepted earlier than RGABX: FZAHX (12 years) vs RGABX (23 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FZAHX (0.37). FZAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). FZAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGABX: FZAHX (0) vs RGABX (250). FZAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.91 vs. RGABX (1.96). FZAHX return over 5 years is better than : 78.15 vs. RGABX (36.12).
| FZAHX | RGABX | FZAHX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 1.39 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 1.39 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.025 | -2.695 | 298% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.3B | 284B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.91 | 1.96 | 609% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.45 | 29.21 | 245% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.15 | 36.12 | 216% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.04 | 48.37 | 343% |