Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZAHX vs RGABX
FZAHX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts FZAHX vs RGABX
FZAHX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAHX vs. RGABX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAHX is a Buy and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FZAHX (34.4B). FZAHX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . FZAHX was incepted earlier than RGABX: FZAHX (13 years) vs RGABX (24 years). RGABX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FZAHX (0.60). FZAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RGABX (32.00). FZAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGABX: FZAHX (0) vs RGABX (250). FZAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.63 vs. RGABX (-1.94). FZAHX return over 5 years is better than : 46.19 vs. RGABX (5.33).
| FZAHX | RGABX | FZAHX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.38 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.38 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.569 | 8.489 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.4B | 353B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.63 | -1.94 | -600% |
| Returns for 3 years | 104.78 | 35.88 | 292% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.19 | 5.33 | 866% |
| Returns for 10 years | 333.24 | 86.62 | 385% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement