Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZAHX vs RGEBX
FZAHX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FZAHX vs RGEBX
FZAHX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAHX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAHX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FZAHX (34.4B). FZAHX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . FZAHX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FZAHX (13 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FZAHX (0.60). FZAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). FZAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FZAHX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FZAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.63 vs. RGEBX (-0.77). FZAHX return over 5 years is better than : 46.19 vs. RGEBX (9.71).
| FZAHX | RGEBX | FZAHX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.08 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.08 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.569 | 8.727 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.4B | 353B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.63 | -0.77 | -1,503% |
| Returns for 3 years | 104.78 | 39.77 | 263% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.19 | 9.71 | 476% |
| Returns for 10 years | 333.24 | 97.58 | 341% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement