Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZANX vs RGACX
FZANX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FZANX vs RGACX
FZANX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZANX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZANX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FZANX (27.2B). FZANX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FZANX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FZANX (13 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FZANX (0.70). FZANX (32.00) and RGACX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. FZANX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FZANX (0) vs RGACX (250). FZANX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.27 vs. RGACX (7.94). FZANX return over 5 years is better than : 35.68 vs. RGACX (13.23).
| FZANX | RGACX | FZANX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.93 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.93 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.815 | 6.185 | 223% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.2B | 361B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.27 | 7.94 | 268% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.73 | 43.05 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.68 | 13.23 | 270% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.52 | 107.97 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers