Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZANX vs RGEBX
FZANX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FZANX vs RGEBX
FZANX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZANX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZANX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FZANX (27.4B). FZANX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . FZANX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FZANX (13 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FZANX (0.70). FZANX (32.00) and RGEBX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. FZANX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FZANX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FZANX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.02 vs. RGEBX (-0.77). FZANX return over 5 years is better than : 21.56 vs. RGEBX (9.71).
| FZANX | RGEBX | FZANX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.08 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.08 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.359 | 8.727 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.4B | 353B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.02 | -0.77 | -649% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.02 | 39.77 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.56 | 9.71 | 222% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.85 | 97.58 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement