Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZAOX vs NAESX
FZAOX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FZAOX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Z
Price$35.60
Change+$0.63 (+1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.44
Change+$0.86 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
FZAOX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAOX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAOX is a Buy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. FZAOX (2.01B). FZAOX pays higher dividends than NAESX: FZAOX (1.55) vs NAESX (1.20). FZAOX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FZAOX (12 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FZAOX (0.90) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FZAOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). FZAOX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FZAOX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.62 vs. FZAOX (0.06). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 66.60 vs. FZAOX (40.24).
| FZAOX | NAESX | FZAOX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.17 | 529% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.17 | 529% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.769 | 6.494 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 161B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.55 | 1.20 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.06 | 13.62 | 0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.23 | 39.23 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.24 | 66.60 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.94 | 132.36 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement