Ad is loading...
FZAOX vs NAESX
FZAOX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FZAOX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Z
Price$29.49
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.82B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$103.01
Change-$0.12 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.36B
FZAOX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAOX vs. NAESX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAOX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. FZAOX (1.82B). FZAOX pays higher dividends than NAESX: FZAOX (1.78) vs NAESX (1.39). FZAOX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FZAOX (12 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FZAOX (0.90) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FZAOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). FZAOX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FZAOX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.19 vs. FZAOX (-10.47). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 75.06 vs. FZAOX (45.64).
| FZAOX | NAESX | FZAOX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.17 | 529% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.17 | 529% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.899 | -10.465 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.82B | 143B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 1.39 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.47 | 0.19 | -5,502% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.36 | 10.16 | -3% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.64 | 75.06 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.11 | 81.51 | -3% |