Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZAOX vs NAESX
FZAOX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FZAOX vs NAESX
FZAOX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAOX vs. NAESX commentary
Aug 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAOX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. FZAOX (2.4B). NAESX pays higher dividends than FZAOX: NAESX (1.10) vs FZAOX (0.03). FZAOX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FZAOX (13 years) vs NAESX (66 years). FZAOX (0.83) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FZAOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). FZAOX (0) and NAESX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FZAOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.10 vs. NAESX (20.91). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 35.51 vs. FZAOX (14.81).
| FZAOX | NAESX | FZAOX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.17 | 488% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.17 | 488% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.565 | 17.675 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.4B | 183B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 1.10 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.10 | 20.91 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.97 | 56.61 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.81 | 35.51 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.69 | 157.37 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers