Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZEMX vs RNWBX
FZEMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts FZEMX vs RNWBX
FZEMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. FZEMX (11.5B). RNWBX pays higher dividends than FZEMX: RNWBX (0.41) vs FZEMX (0.05). FZEMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: FZEMX (5 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than FZEMX (0.73). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FZEMX (31.00). FZEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: FZEMX (0) vs RNWBX (250). FZEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.33 vs. RNWBX (29.69). FZEMX return over 5 years is better than : 37.12 vs. RNWBX (15.20).
| FZEMX | RNWBX | FZEMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.66 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.66 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.980 | 18.201 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.5B | 90.9B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.41 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 55.33 | 29.69 | 186% |
| Returns for 3 years | 88.94 | 52.51 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.12 | 15.20 | 244% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 122.04 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers