Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZEMX vs RNWEX
FZEMX vs RNWEX Comparison
Open Charts FZEMX vs RNWEX
FZEMX vs RNWEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWEX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. FZEMX (11.7B). RNWEX pays higher dividends than FZEMX: RNWEX (0.97) vs FZEMX (0.05). FZEMX was incepted earlier than RNWEX: FZEMX (5 years) vs RNWEX (24 years). RNWEX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FZEMX (0.73). RNWEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FZEMX (31.00). FZEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWEX: FZEMX (0) vs RNWEX (250). FZEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.50 vs. RNWEX (17.21). FZEMX return over 5 years is better than : 25.77 vs. RNWEX (12.74).
| FZEMX | RNWEX | FZEMX / RNWEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.92 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.92 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.806 | 11.055 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 90.7B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.97 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.50 | 17.21 | 183% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.85 | 41.32 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.77 | 12.74 | 202% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 103.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers