Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZEMX vs RNWEX
FZEMX vs RNWEX Comparison
Open Charts FZEMX vs RNWEX
FZEMX vs RNWEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWEX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. FZEMX (11.5B). RNWEX pays higher dividends than FZEMX: RNWEX (0.97) vs FZEMX (0.05). FZEMX was incepted earlier than RNWEX: FZEMX (5 years) vs RNWEX (24 years). RNWEX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FZEMX (0.73). RNWEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FZEMX (31.00). FZEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWEX: FZEMX (0) vs RNWEX (250). FZEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.33 vs. RNWEX (26.50). FZEMX return over 5 years is better than : 37.12 vs. RNWEX (14.80).
| FZEMX | RNWEX | FZEMX / RNWEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.92 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.92 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.980 | 15.053 | 186% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.5B | 90.9B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.97 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | 55.33 | 26.50 | 209% |
| Returns for 3 years | 88.94 | 51.79 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.12 | 14.80 | 251% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 124.83 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers