Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZEMX vs RNWHX
FZEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FZEMX vs RNWHX
FZEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. FZEMX (11.5B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than FZEMX: RNWHX (1.15) vs FZEMX (0.05). FZEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FZEMX (5 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FZEMX (0.73) and RNWHX (0.72) have similar cost to investors . RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FZEMX (31.00). FZEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FZEMX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FZEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.12 vs. RNWHX (31.15). FZEMX return over 5 years is better than : 37.06 vs. RNWHX (20.21).
| FZEMX | RNWHX | FZEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.72 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.72 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.035 | 18.743 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.5B | 90.9B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 1.15 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | 56.12 | 31.15 | 180% |
| Returns for 3 years | 90.49 | 57.37 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.06 | 20.21 | 183% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 132.48 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement