RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. FZEMX (10.8B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than FZEMX: RNWHX (1.17) vs FZEMX (0.06). FZEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FZEMX (5 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FZEMX (0.73) and RNWHX (0.72) have similar cost to investors . RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FZEMX (31.00). FZEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FZEMX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FZEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.59 vs. RNWHX (20.30). FZEMX return over 5 years is better than : 32.59 vs. RNWHX (18.55).

	FZEMX	RNWHX	FZEMX / RNWHX
Total Expense Ratio	0.73	0.72	101%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio	0.73	0.72	101%
Fund Existence	5 years	11 years	-
Gain YTD	19.502	16.349	119%
Front Load	N/A	N/A	-
Min. Initial Investment	0	250	-
Min. Initial Investment IRA	N/A	N/A	-
Net Assets	10.8B	88.6B	12%
Annual Yield % from dividends	0.06	1.17	5%
Returns for 1 year	32.59	20.30	161%
Returns for 3 years	75.91	51.97	146%
Returns for 5 years	32.59	18.55	176%
Returns for 10 years	N/A	106.30	-

View a ticker or compare two or three

Ask AI

Compare

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

MFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
IMOZX	26.59	N/A	N/A
Voya MidCap Opportunities R6
WLTTX	13.84	N/A	N/A
Wilshire International Equity Instl
PIOTX	28.38	N/A	N/A
Victory Pioneer Core Equity A
BGSRX	82.95	N/A	N/A
BlackRock Technology Opportunities R
FSQAX	13.32	N/A	N/A
Fidelity Advisor Sustainable Intl Eq A