Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZICX vs RLVSX
FZICX vs RLVSX Comparison
Open Charts FZICX vs RLVSX
FZICX vs RLVSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZICX vs. RLVSX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZICX is a Hold and RLVSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FZICX has more cash in the bank: 13.9B vs. RLVSX (7.16B). RLVSX pays higher dividends than FZICX: RLVSX (3.57) vs FZICX (1.92). FZICX was incepted earlier than RLVSX: FZICX (21 years) vs RLVSX (41 years). FZICX (1.42) is less costly to investors than RLVSX (0.57). RLVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. FZICX (15.00). FZICX (0) and RLVSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RLVSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.23 vs. FZICX (-1.67). RLVSX return over 5 years is better than : -0.62 vs. FZICX (-2.15).
| FZICX | RLVSX | FZICX / RLVSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.51 | 278% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.57 | 249% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.559 | -1.291 | 198% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.9B | 7.16B | 194% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 3.57 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.67 | -0.23 | 733% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.65 | 9.09 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.15 | -0.62 | 349% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.50 | 1.83 | 355% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement