Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZICX vs RTEAX
FZICX vs RTEAX Comparison
Open Charts FZICX vs RTEAX
FZICX vs RTEAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZICX vs. RTEAX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZICX is a Hold and RTEAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FZICX has more cash in the bank: 13.9B vs. RTEAX (7.16B). RTEAX pays higher dividends than FZICX: RTEAX (3.27) vs FZICX (1.92). FZICX was incepted earlier than RTEAX: FZICX (21 years) vs RTEAX (16 years). FZICX (1.42) is less costly to investors than RTEAX (0.82). RTEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. FZICX (15.00). FZICX (0) and RTEAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RTEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.47 vs. FZICX (-1.67). RTEAX return over 5 years is better than : -1.64 vs. FZICX (-2.15).
| FZICX | RTEAX | FZICX / RTEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.80 | 178% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.82 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.559 | -1.470 | 174% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.9B | 7.16B | 194% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 3.27 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.67 | -0.47 | 358% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.65 | 8.17 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.15 | -1.64 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.50 | 0.81 | 806% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers