Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZICX vs TEAFX
FZICX vs TEAFX Comparison
Open Charts FZICX vs TEAFX
FZICX vs TEAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZICX vs. TEAFX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZICX is a Hold and TEAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEAFX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. FZICX (13.9B). TEAFX pays higher dividends than FZICX: TEAFX (3.26) vs FZICX (1.92). FZICX was incepted earlier than TEAFX: FZICX (21 years) vs TEAFX (18 years). FZICX (1.42) is less costly to investors than TEAFX (0.38). TEAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FZICX (15.00). FZICX has a lower initial minimum investment than TEAFX: FZICX (0) vs TEAFX (250). FZICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.67 vs. TEAFX (-3.38). FZICX return over 5 years is better than : -2.15 vs. TEAFX (-11.56).
| FZICX | TEAFX | FZICX / TEAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.38 | 374% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.38 | 374% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.559 | -3.766 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.9B | 24.2B | 57% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 3.26 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.67 | -3.38 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.65 | 0.98 | 579% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.15 | -11.56 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.50 | -6.47 | -100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers