Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GAFFX vs WLGRX
GAFFX vs WLGRX Comparison
Open Charts GAFFX vs WLGRX
GAFFX vs WLGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GAFFX vs. WLGRX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAFFX is a Hold and WLGRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAFFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. WLGRX (6.17B). GAFFX pays higher dividends than WLGRX: GAFFX (0.51) vs WLGRX (0.00). GAFFX was incepted earlier than WLGRX: GAFFX (9 years) vs WLGRX (20 years). WLGRX (1.22) is less costly to investors than GAFFX (0.29). GAFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WLGRX (18.00). WLGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than GAFFX: WLGRX (0) vs GAFFX (1000000). GAFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.54 vs. WLGRX (-1.27). GAFFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.94 vs. WLGRX (5.88).
| GAFFX | WLGRX | GAFFX / WLGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.14 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.22 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.872 | -1.451 | -611% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 6.17B | 5,853% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.54 | -1.27 | -986% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.29 | 26.76 | 188% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.94 | 5.88 | 356% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 95.62 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement