Advertisement
GARP vs MPWR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GARP is a Hold and MPWR is a Hold.
MPWR | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GARP | MPWR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 15 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 74% | 8 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 76% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CCD | 25.58 | 0.23 | +0.89% |
| Calamos Dynamic Convertible & Income Fund | |||
| BBJP | 76.35 | 0.01 | +0.01% |
| JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF | |||
| GMUN | 49.81 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF | |||
| ONOF | 40.15 | -0.19 | -0.47% |
| Global X Adaptive US Risk Management ETF | |||
| FEBU | 29.76 | -0.15 | -0.51% |
| AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 UncFebETF | |||
GARP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GARP has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GARP jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GARP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GARP | 100% | -1.63% | ||
| LRCX - GARP | 77% Closely correlated | -5.03% | ||
| KLAC - GARP | 73% Closely correlated | -7.44% | ||
| AMAT - GARP | 70% Closely correlated | -3.00% | ||
| MPWR - GARP | 67% Closely correlated | -9.29% | ||
| NVDA - GARP | 66% Closely correlated | -2.37% | ||
More | ||||
MPWR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MPWR has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MPWR jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MPWR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPWR | 100% | -9.29% | ||
| KLAC - MPWR | 74% Closely correlated | -7.44% | ||
| LRCX - MPWR | 73% Closely correlated | -5.03% | ||
| NXPI - MPWR | 73% Closely correlated | -4.11% | ||
| ALGM - MPWR | 71% Closely correlated | -3.11% | ||
| AMAT - MPWR | 70% Closely correlated | -3.00% | ||
More | ||||