GARPF
Price
$0.20
Change
+$0.01 (+5.26%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
2.38B
GSFD
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.01 (-8.33%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
75.29K
Interact to see
Advertisement

GARPF vs GSFD

Header iconGARPF vs GSFD Comparison
Open Charts GARPF vs GSFDBanner chart's image
Golden Agri-Resources
Price$0.20
Change+$0.01 (+5.26%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization2.38B
Global Seafood Technologies
Price$0.11
Change-$0.01 (-8.33%)
Volume$5.05K
Capitalization75.29K
GARPF vs GSFD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GARPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSFD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GARPF vs. GSFD commentary
Aug 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GARPF is a Buy and GSFD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2025
Stock price -- (GARPF: $0.20 vs. GSFD: $0.11)
Brand notoriety: GARPF and GSFD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GARPF: 25% vs. GSFD: 198%
Market capitalization -- GARPF: $2.38B vs. GSFD: $75.29K
GARPF [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] is valued at $2.38B. GSFD’s [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] market capitalization is $75.29K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry ranges from $34.75B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry is $2.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GARPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGSFD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GARPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GSFD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GARPF is a better buy in the long-term than GSFD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GARPF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSFD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GARPF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • GSFD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both GARPF and GSFD are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

GARPF (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GSFD (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was +0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.08%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (+0.04% weekly)

The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GARPF($2.38B) has a higher market cap than GSFD($75.3K). GSFD YTD gains are higher at: 11.817 vs. GARPF (3.947).
GARPFGSFDGARPF / GSFD
Capitalization2.38B75.3K3,162,019%
EBITDA1.57BN/A-
Gain YTD3.94711.81733%
P/E Ratio3.08N/A-
Revenue11.2BN/A-
Total Cash883MN/A-
Total Debt3.08BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GARPF vs GSFD: Fundamental Ratings
GARPF
GSFD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4223
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
46100
SMR RATING
1..100
95100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4662
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
92100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GARPF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSFD (59). This means that GARPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSFD’s over the last 12 months.

GARPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSFD (100). This means that GARPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSFD’s over the last 12 months.

GARPF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as GSFD (100). This means that GARPF’s stock grew similarly to GSFD’s over the last 12 months.

GARPF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as GSFD (62). This means that GARPF’s stock grew similarly to GSFD’s over the last 12 months.

GARPF's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as GSFD (100). This means that GARPF’s stock grew similarly to GSFD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GARPFGSFD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
58%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GARPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSFD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CPF26.29-0.39
-1.46%
Central Pacific Financial Corp
VERO2.45-0.04
-1.61%
Venus Concept
PSEC2.83-0.07
-2.41%
Prospect Capital Corp
GRAB4.77-0.20
-4.02%
Grab Holdings Limited
BLNK0.91-0.04
-4.44%
Blink Charging Co

GARPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GARPF and EDESY have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GARPF and EDESY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GARPF
1D Price
Change %
GARPF100%
N/A
EDESY - GARPF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRCLF - GARPF
5%
Poorly correlated
-4.44%
GSFD - GARPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HERB - GARPF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GARPY - GARPF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GSFD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GSFD and CTUNF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GSFD and CTUNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSFD
1D Price
Change %
GSFD100%
N/A
CTUNF - GSFD
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GARPF - GSFD
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDESY - GSFD
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HERB - GSFD
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRGSF - GSFD
-4%
Poorly correlated
-1.49%
More