Ad is loading...
GBCCX vs RMEBX
GBCCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GBCCX vs RMEBX
Gabelli Dividend Growth C
Price$13.56
Change+$0.23 (+1.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.24M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$53.26
Change+$0.76 (+1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
GBCCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCCX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. GBCCX (17.2M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GBCCX: RMEBX (1.18) vs GBCCX (0.00). GBCCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GBCCX (21 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GBCCX (3.45) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCCX (19.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCCX: RMEBX (250) vs GBCCX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.74 vs. GBCCX (-12.93). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 52.21 vs. GBCCX (12.58).
| GBCCX | RMEBX | GBCCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.76 | 1.07 | 258% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.45 | 1.07 | 322% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.653 | -2.724 | 244% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.2M | 95.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.18 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.93 | 1.74 | -743% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.53 | 5.82 | -215% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.58 | 52.21 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | -26.60 | 53.41 | -50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...