Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCCX vs RMEBX
GBCCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GBCCX vs RMEBX
Gabelli Dividend Growth C
Price$15.96
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.62M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.57
Change+$0.12 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
GBCCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCCX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. GBCCX (19.6M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GBCCX: RMEBX (1.05) vs GBCCX (0.00). GBCCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GBCCX (22 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GBCCX (3.40) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCCX (23.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCCX: RMEBX (250) vs GBCCX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.71 vs. GBCCX (0.57). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 57.72 vs. GBCCX (17.38).
| GBCCX | RMEBX | GBCCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.75 | 1.07 | 257% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.40 | 1.07 | 318% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.625 | 14.848 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.6M | 113B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.05 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.57 | 7.71 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.12 | 43.29 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.38 | 57.72 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.21 | 92.43 | -5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement