Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCCX vs RMEBX
GBCCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GBCCX vs RMEBX
Gabelli Dividend Growth C
Price$14.51
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.57M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.43
Change+$0.21 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104.55B
GBCCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCCX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. GBCCX (18.6M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GBCCX: RMEBX (1.16) vs GBCCX (0.00). GBCCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GBCCX (21 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GBCCX (3.40) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCCX (23.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCCX: RMEBX (250) vs GBCCX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.18 vs. GBCCX (-5.84). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 52.34 vs. GBCCX (10.17).
| GBCCX | RMEBX | GBCCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.75 | 1.07 | 257% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.40 | 1.07 | 318% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.611 | 4.892 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.6M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.16 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.84 | 8.18 | -71% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.34 | 17.52 | -2% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.17 | 52.34 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.67 | 66.67 | -31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement