Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCCX vs RMFEX
GBCCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts GBCCX vs RMFEX
Gabelli Dividend Growth C
Price$14.51
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.57M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$57.50
Change+$0.22 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104.55B
GBCCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCCX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. GBCCX (18.6M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than GBCCX: RMFEX (1.58) vs GBCCX (0.00). GBCCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: GBCCX (21 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). GBCCX (3.40) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCCX (23.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCCX: RMFEX (250) vs GBCCX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.69 vs. GBCCX (-5.84). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 55.83 vs. GBCCX (10.17).
| GBCCX | RMFEX | GBCCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.75 | 0.62 | 444% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.40 | 0.62 | 548% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.611 | 5.102 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.6M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.58 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.84 | 8.69 | -67% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.34 | 19.13 | -2% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.17 | 55.83 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.67 | 74.62 | -28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement