Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCCX vs RMFEX
GBCCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts GBCCX vs RMFEX
Gabelli Dividend Growth C
Price$15.25
Change+$0.14 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.92M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.09
Change+$0.76 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets107.77B
GBCCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCCX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. GBCCX (18.9M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than GBCCX: RMFEX (1.51) vs GBCCX (0.00). GBCCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: GBCCX (22 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). GBCCX (3.40) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCCX (23.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCCX: RMFEX (250) vs GBCCX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.89 vs. GBCCX (-0.85). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 58.94 vs. GBCCX (12.76).
| GBCCX | RMFEX | GBCCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.75 | 0.62 | 444% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.40 | 0.62 | 548% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.812 | 10.243 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.9M | 108B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.85 | 9.89 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.41 | 27.52 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.76 | 58.94 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | -12.61 | 86.68 | -15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement