Ad is loading...
GBCCX vs RMFEX
GBCCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts GBCCX vs RMFEX
Gabelli Dividend Growth C
Price$13.56
Change+$0.23 (+1.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.24M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$53.29
Change+$0.77 (+1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
GBCCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCCX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. GBCCX (17.2M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than GBCCX: RMFEX (1.61) vs GBCCX (0.00). GBCCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: GBCCX (21 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). GBCCX (3.45) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCCX (19.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCCX: RMFEX (250) vs GBCCX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.21 vs. GBCCX (-12.93). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 55.72 vs. GBCCX (12.58).
| GBCCX | RMFEX | GBCCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.76 | 0.62 | 445% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.45 | 0.62 | 556% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.653 | -2.593 | 257% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.2M | 95.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.61 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.93 | 2.21 | -584% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.53 | 7.26 | -173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.58 | 55.72 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | -26.60 | 60.75 | -44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...