Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCCX vs RMFEX
GBCCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts GBCCX vs RMFEX
Gabelli Dividend Growth C
Price$15.64
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.85M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.42
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
GBCCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCCX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. GBCCX (19.8M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than GBCCX: RMFEX (1.46) vs GBCCX (0.00). GBCCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: GBCCX (22 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). GBCCX (3.40) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCCX (23.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCCX: RMFEX (250) vs GBCCX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.34 vs. GBCCX (-5.15). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 55.02 vs. GBCCX (7.49).
| GBCCX | RMFEX | GBCCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.75 | 0.62 | 444% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.40 | 0.62 | 548% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.594 | 13.076 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.8M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.15 | 6.34 | -81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.68 | 29.13 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.49 | 55.02 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.96 | 92.11 | -10% |