Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCIX vs RMEBX
GBCIX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GBCIX vs RMEBX
Gabelli Dividend Growth I
Price$19.13
Change+$0.08 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.51M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.56
Change+$0.11 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
GBCIX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCIX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCIX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. GBCIX (19.5M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GBCIX: RMEBX (1.09) vs GBCIX (0.55). GBCIX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GBCIX (21 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GBCIX (2.40) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCIX (23.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCIX: RMEBX (250) vs GBCIX (10000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.43 vs. GBCIX (2.16). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 59.30 vs. GBCIX (31.88).
| GBCIX | RMEBX | GBCIX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.40 | 1.07 | 224% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.456 | 12.994 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.5M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 1.09 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.16 | 7.43 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.51 | 33.12 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.88 | 59.30 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.25 | 94.40 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement