Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCIX vs RMEBX
GBCIX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GBCIX vs RMEBX
Gabelli Dividend Growth I
Price$17.43
Change-$0.03 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.64M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.64
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
GBCIX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCIX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCIX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. GBCIX (18.6M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GBCIX: RMEBX (1.16) vs GBCIX (0.60). GBCIX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GBCIX (21 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GBCIX (2.40) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCIX (23.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCIX: RMEBX (250) vs GBCIX (10000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.30 vs. GBCIX (-3.44). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 49.85 vs. GBCIX (19.61).
| GBCIX | RMEBX | GBCIX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.40 | 1.07 | 224% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.070 | 5.349 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.6M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.16 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.44 | 8.30 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.28 | 17.96 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.61 | 49.85 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.31 | 68.21 | -0% |