Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCIX vs RMEBX
GBCIX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GBCIX vs RMEBX
Gabelli Dividend Growth I
Price$18.27
Change-$0.05 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.15M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.80
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.96B
GBCIX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCIX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCIX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. GBCIX (19.2M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GBCIX: RMEBX (1.11) vs GBCIX (0.57). GBCIX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GBCIX (21 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GBCIX (2.40) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GBCIX (23.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCIX: RMEBX (250) vs GBCIX (10000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.12 vs. GBCIX (2.67). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 51.78 vs. GBCIX (23.74).
| GBCIX | RMEBX | GBCIX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.40 | 1.07 | 224% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.146 | 9.513 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.2M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 1.11 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.67 | 9.12 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.94 | 21.70 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.74 | 51.78 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.74 | 76.00 | 11% |