Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBCIX vs RMEBX
GBCIX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GBCIX vs RMEBX
GBCIX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBCIX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBCIX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. GBCIX (21.8M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GBCIX: RMEBX (1.04) vs GBCIX (0.77). GBCIX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GBCIX (22 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). GBCIX (1.69) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GBCIX (31.00) and RMEBX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBCIX: RMEBX (250) vs GBCIX (10000). GBCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.51 vs. RMEBX (9.98). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.93 vs. GBCIX (-1.43).
| GBCIX | RMEBX | GBCIX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.07 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.280 | 5.801 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.8M | 115B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 1.04 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.51 | 9.98 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.87 | 34.14 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.43 | 32.93 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.62 | 89.84 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement