It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GBDC’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileRMCO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GBDC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMCO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
GBDC (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.47% price change this week, while RMCO (@Investment Managers) price change was +15.19% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.37%.
GBDC is expected to report earnings on Nov 24, 2025.
Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
GBDC | RMCO | GBDC / RMCO | |
Capitalization | 3.96B | 24.3M | 16,288% |
EBITDA | N/A | -161.5K | - |
Gain YTD | 3.168 | 67.001 | 5% |
P/E Ratio | 10.46 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 301M | 1.57M | 19,196% |
Total Cash | 117M | 133K | 87,970% |
Total Debt | 4.81B | 621K | 774,074% |
GBDC | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 17 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GBDC | RMCO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago37% | 1 day ago31% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago57% | 1 day ago39% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago24% | 1 day ago39% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago32% | 1 day ago60% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago42% | 1 day ago42% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago29% | 1 day ago45% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 22 days ago41% | 7 days ago53% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago32% | 20 days ago72% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago47% | 1 day ago52% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago46% | 1 day ago47% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GBDC has been closely correlated with OBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GBDC jumps, then OBDC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GBDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GBDC | 100% | +0.47% | ||
OBDC - GBDC | 84% Closely correlated | +1.35% | ||
FSK - GBDC | 83% Closely correlated | +0.97% | ||
ARCC - GBDC | 83% Closely correlated | +0.09% | ||
BCSF - GBDC | 81% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
SLRC - GBDC | 79% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that RMCO and SCM have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMCO and SCM's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RMCO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RMCO | 100% | -1.03% | ||
SCM - RMCO | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.23% | ||
SAMG - RMCO | 22% Poorly correlated | +3.02% | ||
SAR - RMCO | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.12% | ||
GBDC - RMCO | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.47% | ||
FDUS - RMCO | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.80% | ||
More |