Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GBFAX vs RNWHX
GBFAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts GBFAX vs RNWHX
GBFAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GBFAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBFAX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. GBFAX (337M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than GBFAX: RNWHX (1.17) vs GBFAX (0.55). GBFAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: GBFAX (33 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). GBFAX (1.63) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. GBFAX (29.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GBFAX: RNWHX (250) vs GBFAX (1000). GBFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.74 vs. RNWHX (21.78). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 17.87 vs. GBFAX (4.23).
| GBFAX | RNWHX | GBFAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 0.72 | 224% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 0.72 | 226% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.764 | 13.978 | 120% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337M | 90.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 1.17 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.74 | 21.78 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.73 | 44.40 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.23 | 17.87 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.88 | 107.97 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement