GBFH
Price
$20.82
Change
-$0.20 (-0.95%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
301.27M
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MBWM
Price
$60.08
Change
+$0.35 (+0.59%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.04B
78 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GBFH vs MBWM

GBFH vs MBWM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GBFH vs. MBWM commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBFH is a Buy and MBWM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (GBFH: $20.82 vs. MBWM: $60.08)
Brand notoriety: GBFH and MBWM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GBFH: 126% vs. MBWM: 38%
Market capitalization -- GBFH: $301.27M vs. MBWM: $1.04B
GBFH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $301.27M. MBWM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GBFH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMBWM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GBFH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MBWM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the long-term than GBFH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GBFH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBWM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GBFH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MBWM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the short-term than GBFH.

Price Growth

GBFH (@Regional Banks) experienced а -32.84% price change this week, while MBWM (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

GBFH is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2026.

MBWM is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBWM($1.04B) has a higher market cap than GBFH($301M). GBFH has higher P/E ratio than MBWM: GBFH (16.27) vs MBWM (10.56). MBWM YTD gains are higher at: 26.791 vs. GBFH (-38.566). GBFH has less debt than MBWM: GBFH (35.9M) vs MBWM (472M). MBWM has higher revenues than GBFH: MBWM (261M) vs GBFH (76.2M).
GBFHMBWMGBFH / MBWM
Capitalization301M1.04B29%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-38.56626.791-144%
P/E Ratio16.2710.56154%
Revenue76.2M261M29%
Total CashN/A48.4M-
Total Debt35.9M472M8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBWM: Fundamental Ratings
MBWM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
12
SMR RATING
1..100
47
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
33
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GBFHMBWM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GBFH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MBWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGQPX21.980.07
+0.32%
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Growth P
RRITX22.650.05
+0.22%
T. Rowe Price International Stock R
TFCCX22.00-0.03
-0.14%
Touchstone Large Cap C
GLNNX26.12-0.10
-0.38%
MFS Global New Discovery R6
MMUIX26.30-0.22
-0.83%
MFS Utilities I

GBFH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GBFH has been closely correlated with CCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GBFH jumps, then CCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBFH
1D Price
Change %
GBFH100%
-0.95%
CCB - GBFH
68%
Closely correlated
+2.71%
MBWM - GBFH
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
FMNB - GBFH
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
HBNC - GBFH
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
QCRH - GBFH
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
More