GBLBF
Price
$77.30
Change
+$0.25 (+0.32%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Capitalization
11.08B
JHG
Price
$30.20
Change
-$2.56 (-7.81%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
5.22B
25 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GBLBF vs JHG

Header iconGBLBF vs JHG Comparison
Open Charts GBLBF vs JHGBanner chart's image
Groupe Bruxelles Lambert SA
Price$77.30
Change+$0.25 (+0.32%)
Volume$1.48K
Capitalization11.08B
Janus Henderson Group
Price$30.20
Change-$2.56 (-7.81%)
Volume$1.94M
Capitalization5.22B
GBLBF vs JHG Comparison Chart
Loading...
JHG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GBLBF vs. JHG commentary
Apr 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBLBF is a Hold and JHG is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 07, 2025
Stock price -- (GBLBF: $77.30 vs. JHG: $30.20)
Brand notoriety: GBLBF and JHG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GBLBF: 179% vs. JHG: 145%
Market capitalization -- GBLBF: $11.08B vs. JHG: $5.22B
GBLBF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $11.08B. JHG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $5.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GBLBF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileJHG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GBLBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • JHG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GBLBF is a better buy in the long-term than JHG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JHG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • JHG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

GBLBF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.85% price change this week, while JHG (@Investment Managers) price change was -16.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -5.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

JHG is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-5.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GBLBF($11.1B) has a higher market cap than JHG($5.22B). GBLBF has higher P/E ratio than JHG: GBLBF (47.39) vs JHG (13.66). GBLBF YTD gains are higher at: 14.012 vs. JHG (-28.368). GBLBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 676M vs. JHG (563M). GBLBF has more cash in the bank: 3.3B vs. JHG (1.89B). JHG has less debt than GBLBF: JHG (382M) vs GBLBF (7.81B). GBLBF has higher revenues than JHG: GBLBF (9B) vs JHG (2.1B).
GBLBFJHGGBLBF / JHG
Capitalization11.1B5.22B213%
EBITDA676M563M120%
Gain YTD14.012-28.368-49%
P/E Ratio47.3913.66347%
Revenue9B2.1B428%
Total Cash3.3B1.89B175%
Total Debt7.81B382M2,043%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GBLBF vs JHG: Fundamental Ratings
GBLBF
JHG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5015
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10043
SMR RATING
1..100
6673
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4584
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
455
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GBLBF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as JHG (30) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that GBLBF’s stock grew similarly to JHG’s over the last 12 months.

JHG's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GBLBF (100) in the null industry. This means that JHG’s stock grew somewhat faster than GBLBF’s over the last 12 months.

GBLBF's SMR Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as JHG (73) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that GBLBF’s stock grew similarly to JHG’s over the last 12 months.

GBLBF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JHG (84) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that GBLBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JHG’s over the last 12 months.

GBLBF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JHG (55) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that GBLBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JHG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JHG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
JHG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FUSI50.44-0.02
-0.04%
American Century Multisector Flt Inc ETF
IBMO25.52-0.05
-0.18%
iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bd ETF
HYXF44.90-0.90
-1.97%
iShares ESG Advanced Hi Yld Corp Bd ETF
MLPX56.83-5.59
-8.96%
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
GCAD30.81-3.83
-11.04%
Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Dfns ETF

GBLBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GBLBF and VRTS have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GBLBF and VRTS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBLBF
1D Price
Change %
GBLBF100%
N/A
VRTS - GBLBF
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.00%
JHG - GBLBF
30%
Poorly correlated
-7.81%
AMP - GBLBF
28%
Poorly correlated
-7.38%
BBUC - GBLBF
27%
Poorly correlated
-9.93%
BN - GBLBF
26%
Poorly correlated
-8.16%
More

JHG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JHG has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JHG jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JHG
1D Price
Change %
JHG100%
-7.81%
KKR - JHG
80%
Closely correlated
-9.52%
CG - JHG
78%
Closely correlated
-7.28%
BN - JHG
76%
Closely correlated
-8.16%
APO - JHG
74%
Closely correlated
-11.96%
ARES - JHG
74%
Closely correlated
-9.61%
More