GBR
Price
$0.81
Change
+$0.03 (+3.85%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
4.16M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NYC
Price
$6.94
Change
-$0.11 (-1.56%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
21.96M
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GBR vs NYC

GBR vs NYC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GBR vs. NYC commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBR is a Hold and NYC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (GBR: $0.81 vs. NYC: $6.94)
Brand notoriety: GBR and NYC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GBR: 83% vs. NYC: 113%
Market capitalization -- GBR: $4.16M vs. NYC: $21.96M
GBR [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $4.16M. NYC’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $21.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $2.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GBR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNYC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GBR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NYC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GBR and NYC are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GBR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NYC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GBR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NYC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GBR is a better buy in the short-term than NYC.

Price Growth

GBR (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +13.56% price change this week, while NYC (@Real Estate Development) price change was -8.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

NYC is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+0.19% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NYC($22M) has a higher market cap than GBR($4.16M). GBR YTD gains are higher at: 8.407 vs. NYC (-16.273). NYC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 19.2M vs. GBR (-239K). NYC has more cash in the bank: 2.5M vs. GBR (318K). GBR has less debt than NYC: GBR (155K) vs NYC (350M). NYC has higher revenues than GBR: NYC (38.3M) vs GBR (156K).
GBRNYCGBR / NYC
Capitalization4.16M22M19%
EBITDA-239K19.2M-1%
Gain YTD8.407-16.273-52%
P/E RatioN/A1.29-
Revenue156K38.3M0%
Total Cash318K2.5M13%
Total Debt155K350M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GBR vs NYC: Fundamental Ratings
GBR
NYC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3260
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4882
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6656
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NYC's Valuation (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GBR (97) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that NYC’s stock grew significantly faster than GBR’s over the last 12 months.

NYC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GBR (100) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that NYC’s stock grew similarly to GBR’s over the last 12 months.

GBR's SMR Rating (90) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as NYC (98) in the null industry. This means that GBR’s stock grew similarly to NYC’s over the last 12 months.

GBR's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NYC (82) in the null industry. This means that GBR’s stock grew somewhat faster than NYC’s over the last 12 months.

NYC's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as GBR (66) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that NYC’s stock grew similarly to GBR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GBRNYC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GBR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NYC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IONQ44.863.33
+8.02%
IonQ
ALT3.110.16
+5.42%
Altimmune
SSM2.740.10
+3.79%
Sono Group NV
KYIV13.250.43
+3.35%
Kyivstar Group Ltd
BZFD1.110.01
+0.91%
BuzzFeed Inc.

GBR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GBR and NEN have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GBR and NEN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBR
1D Price
Change %
GBR100%
+3.82%
NEN - GBR
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IRS - GBR
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.93%
NYC - GBR
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
FTHM - GBR
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
BPYPP - GBR
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
More

NYC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NYC and DHC have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NYC and DHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NYC
1D Price
Change %
NYC100%
-1.56%
DHC - NYC
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
DBRG - NYC
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
AIRE - NYC
21%
Poorly correlated
+10.49%
GBR - NYC
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.82%
AGNT - NYC
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
More