GBUY vs SHOP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBUY is a StrongBuy and SHOP is a Hold.
SHOP | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 68 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GBUY | SHOP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 82% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 85% | 12 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
GBUY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GBUY has been closely correlated with MRVL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GBUY jumps, then MRVL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GBUY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GBUY | 100% | N/A | ||
| MRVL - GBUY | 69% Closely correlated | +8.13% | ||
| AMZN - GBUY | 66% Loosely correlated | +8.07% | ||
| HOOD - GBUY | 62% Loosely correlated | +5.09% | ||
| BLK - GBUY | 57% Loosely correlated | +3.75% | ||
| AMD - GBUY | 57% Loosely correlated | +5.13% | ||
More | ||||
SHOP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHOP has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHOP jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHOP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHOP | 100% | +13.70% | ||
| COIN - SHOP | 67% Closely correlated | +3.96% | ||
| ALIT - SHOP | 65% Loosely correlated | +3.95% | ||
| CLSK - SHOP | 64% Loosely correlated | +4.57% | ||
| HUBS - SHOP | 64% Loosely correlated | +9.88% | ||
| RIOT - SHOP | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.59% | ||
More | ||||