GCAAF
Price
$30.45
Change
+$0.01 (+0.03%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
905.93M
MAIN
Price
$65.83
Change
+$0.26 (+0.40%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
4.02B
11 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GCAAF vs MAIN

Header iconGCAAF vs MAIN Comparison
Open Charts GCAAF vs MAINBanner chart's image
Guardian Capital Group
Price$30.45
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
Volume$346
Capitalization905.93M
Main Street Capital
Price$65.83
Change+$0.26 (+0.40%)
Volume$366.83K
Capitalization4.02B
GCAAF vs MAIN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GCAAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GCAAF vs. MAIN commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCAAF is a Hold and MAIN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (GCAAF: $30.45 vs. MAIN: $65.83)
Brand notoriety: GCAAF and MAIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GCAAF: 57% vs. MAIN: 81%
Market capitalization -- GCAAF: $905.93M vs. MAIN: $4.02B
GCAAF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $905.93M. MAIN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $4.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GCAAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMAIN’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • GCAAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MAIN’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAIN is a better buy in the long-term than GCAAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GCAAF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAIN’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GCAAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MAIN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAIN is a better buy in the short-term than GCAAF.

Price Growth

GCAAF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.16% price change this week, while MAIN (@Investment Managers) price change was +2.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.66% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAIN($4.02B) has a higher market cap than GCAAF($906M). GCAAF has higher P/E ratio than MAIN: GCAAF (12.09) vs MAIN (8.97). MAIN YTD gains are higher at: 17.124 vs. GCAAF (7.711). GCAAF has less debt than MAIN: GCAAF (159M) vs MAIN (1.8B). MAIN has higher revenues than GCAAF: MAIN (510M) vs GCAAF (255M).
GCAAFMAINGCAAF / MAIN
Capitalization906M4.02B23%
EBITDA141MN/A-
Gain YTD7.71117.12445%
P/E Ratio12.098.97135%
Revenue255M510M50%
Total Cash139MN/A-
Total Debt159M1.8B9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GCAAF vs MAIN: Fundamental Ratings
GCAAF
MAIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8143
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
466
SMR RATING
1..100
8213
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5843
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2731
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAIN's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as GCAAF (25). This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to GCAAF’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCAAF (46). This means that MAIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCAAF’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's SMR Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GCAAF (82). This means that MAIN’s stock grew significantly faster than GCAAF’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as GCAAF (58). This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to GCAAF’s over the last 12 months.

GCAAF's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as MAIN (31). This means that GCAAF’s stock grew similarly to MAIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GCAAFMAIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GCAAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTAGX15.120.19
+1.27%
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth A
LOGWX29.800.35
+1.19%
Lord Abbett Developing Growth F3
TCGRX30.910.34
+1.11%
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth R4
DHLYX34.050.17
+0.50%
Diamond Hill Large Cap Y
HDVAX14.45-0.02
-0.14%
Hartford International Equity A

GCAAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GCAAF and AGFMF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GCAAF and AGFMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCAAF
1D Price
Change %
GCAAF100%
+0.03%
AGFMF - GCAAF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAIN - GCAAF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
HTGC - GCAAF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
GBLBY - GCAAF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HALFF - GCAAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MAIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAIN has been closely correlated with FSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAIN jumps, then FSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAIN
1D Price
Change %
MAIN100%
+0.40%
FSK - MAIN
84%
Closely correlated
-0.18%
ARCC - MAIN
83%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
GLAD - MAIN
81%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
TSLX - MAIN
79%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
BCSF - MAIN
78%
Closely correlated
N/A
More