Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCCLX vs SCWFX
GCCLX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts GCCLX vs SCWFX
GCCLX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCCLX vs. SCWFX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCCLX is a Hold and SCWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 94.3B vs. GCCLX (567M). GCCLX pays higher dividends than SCWFX: GCCLX (2.07) vs SCWFX (0.58). GCCLX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: GCCLX (6 years) vs SCWFX (25 years). SCWFX (1.07) is less costly to investors than GCCLX (0.89). GCCLX (41.00) and SCWFX (41.00) have comparable annual turnover. GCCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCWFX: GCCLX (0) vs SCWFX (250). GCCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.08 vs. SCWFX (12.66). SCWFX return over 5 years is better than : -7.17 vs. GCCLX (-15.11).
| GCCLX | SCWFX | GCCLX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.07 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.07 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.874 | 10.314 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 567M | 94.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 0.58 | 361% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.08 | 12.66 | 301% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.52 | 27.26 | -13% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.11 | -7.17 | 211% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 79.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers