Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCCLX vs SCWFX
GCCLX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts GCCLX vs SCWFX
GCCLX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCCLX vs. SCWFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCCLX is a Hold and SCWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. GCCLX (571M). GCCLX pays higher dividends than SCWFX: GCCLX (2.04) vs SCWFX (0.56). GCCLX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: GCCLX (7 years) vs SCWFX (26 years). SCWFX (1.07) is less costly to investors than GCCLX (0.89). GCCLX (41.00) and SCWFX (41.00) have comparable annual turnover. GCCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCWFX: GCCLX (0) vs SCWFX (250). GCCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.15 vs. SCWFX (8.85). SCWFX return over 5 years is better than : -9.66 vs. GCCLX (-14.83).
| GCCLX | SCWFX | GCCLX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.07 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.07 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.597 | 12.243 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 571M | 91.4B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.04 | 0.56 | 364% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.15 | 8.85 | 273% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.73 | 37.17 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.83 | -9.66 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 81.80 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement