Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCEAX vs RWIBX
GCEAX vs RWIBX Comparison
Open Charts GCEAX vs RWIBX
GCEAX vs RWIBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCEAX vs. RWIBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCEAX is a Hold and RWIBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIBX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. GCEAX (1.45B). RWIBX pays higher dividends than GCEAX: RWIBX (0.74) vs GCEAX (0.55). GCEAX was incepted earlier than RWIBX: GCEAX (12 years) vs RWIBX (24 years). RWIBX (1.51) is less costly to investors than GCEAX (1.03). GCEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RWIBX (44.00). RWIBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCEAX: RWIBX (250) vs GCEAX (2500). RWIBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.83 vs. GCEAX (2.80). RWIBX return over 5 years is better than : 27.84 vs. GCEAX (9.05).
| GCEAX | RWIBX | GCEAX / RWIBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.51 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.51 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.464 | 13.017 | 42% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.45B | 160B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.74 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.80 | 17.83 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.92 | 46.73 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.05 | 27.84 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.91 | 98.11 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement