Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCFRX vs PFIPX
GCFRX vs PFIPX Comparison
Open Charts GCFRX vs PFIPX
GCFRX vs PFIPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCFRX vs. PFIPX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCFRX is a Hold and PFIPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFIPX has more cash in the bank: 2.13B vs. GCFRX (233M). GCFRX pays higher dividends than PFIPX: GCFRX (3.32) vs PFIPX (2.64). GCFRX was incepted earlier than PFIPX: GCFRX (23 years) vs PFIPX (20 years). PFIPX (1.26) and GCFRX (1.21) have similar cost to investors . GCFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.77 vs. PFIPX (23.90). GCFRX (0) and PFIPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PFIPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.53 vs. GCFRX (6.13). PFIPX return over 5 years is better than : 6.90 vs. GCFRX (5.50).
| GCFRX | PFIPX | GCFRX / PFIPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.26 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.26 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.390 | 2.857 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 233M | 2.13B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.32 | 2.64 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.13 | 6.53 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.27 | 23.10 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.50 | 6.90 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.51 | 33.07 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement