Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCFRX vs SAUPX
GCFRX vs SAUPX Comparison
Open Charts GCFRX vs SAUPX
GCFRX vs SAUPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCFRX vs. SAUPX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCFRX is a Hold and SAUPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAUPX has more cash in the bank: 2.11B vs. GCFRX (230M). GCFRX pays higher dividends than SAUPX: GCFRX (3.30) vs SAUPX (2.84). GCFRX was incepted earlier than SAUPX: GCFRX (23 years) vs SAUPX (30 years). GCFRX (1.21) is less costly to investors than SAUPX (1.00). GCFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.77 vs. SAUPX (23.90). GCFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than SAUPX: GCFRX (0) vs SAUPX (1000). GCFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.62 vs. SAUPX (3.26). SAUPX return over 5 years is better than : 7.78 vs. GCFRX (5.04).
| GCFRX | SAUPX | GCFRX / SAUPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.00 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.00 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.189 | 2.813 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 230M | 2.11B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.30 | 2.84 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.62 | 3.26 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.27 | 25.49 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.04 | 7.78 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.63 | 36.31 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement