Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCFRX vs SAUPX
GCFRX vs SAUPX Comparison
Open Charts GCFRX vs SAUPX
GCFRX vs SAUPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCFRX vs. SAUPX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCFRX is a Buy and SAUPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAUPX has more cash in the bank: 2.17B vs. GCFRX (234M). GCFRX pays higher dividends than SAUPX: GCFRX (3.22) vs SAUPX (2.85). GCFRX was incepted earlier than SAUPX: GCFRX (23 years) vs SAUPX (30 years). GCFRX (1.21) is less costly to investors than SAUPX (1.00). GCFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.77 vs. SAUPX (23.90). GCFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than SAUPX: GCFRX (0) vs SAUPX (1000). SAUPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.73 vs. GCFRX (7.98). SAUPX return over 5 years is better than : 9.79 vs. GCFRX (7.12).
| GCFRX | SAUPX | GCFRX / SAUPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.00 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.00 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.019 | 3.389 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 234M | 2.17B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.22 | 2.85 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.98 | 8.73 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.60 | 25.65 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.12 | 9.79 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.17 | 40.27 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement