Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCFSX vs RPFGX
GCFSX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts GCFSX vs RPFGX
GCFSX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCFSX vs. RPFGX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCFSX is a Hold and RPFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.19B vs. GCFSX (156M). GCFSX (1.26) and RPFGX (1.24) have matching dividends . GCFSX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: GCFSX (8 years) vs RPFGX (35 years). GCFSX (2.37) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). RPFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. GCFSX (9.00). GCFSX (1000) and RPFGX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GCFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.58 vs. RPFGX (12.69). GCFSX return over 5 years is better than : 123.46 vs. RPFGX (57.68).
| GCFSX | RPFGX | GCFSX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.94 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.37 | 0.94 | 252% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.684 | 4.233 | 323% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156M | 1.19B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 1.24 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.58 | 12.69 | 186% |
| Returns for 3 years | 120.72 | 80.46 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 123.46 | 57.68 | 214% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 128.21 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement