Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCFSX vs RPFGX
GCFSX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts GCFSX vs RPFGX
GCFSX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCFSX vs. RPFGX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCFSX is a Buy and RPFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.19B vs. GCFSX (153M). GCFSX (1.26) and RPFGX (1.24) have matching dividends . GCFSX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: GCFSX (8 years) vs RPFGX (35 years). GCFSX (2.37) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). RPFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. GCFSX (9.00). GCFSX (1000) and RPFGX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GCFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.03 vs. RPFGX (14.03). GCFSX return over 5 years is better than : 124.02 vs. RPFGX (60.53).
| GCFSX | RPFGX | GCFSX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.94 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.37 | 0.94 | 252% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.679 | 3.414 | 371% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 153M | 1.19B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 1.24 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.03 | 14.03 | 207% |
| Returns for 3 years | 105.50 | 66.86 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 124.02 | 60.53 | 205% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 132.79 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement