Ad is loading...
GCLSX vs RMEBX
GCLSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCLSX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts Svc
Price$24.15
Change-$0.37 (-1.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets557.47M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.54
Change-$0.62 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.48B
GCLSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCLSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCLSX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. GCLSX (557M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GCLSX: RMEBX (1.54) vs GCLSX (0.88). GCLSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCLSX (26 years) vs RMEBX (10 years). GCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 208.00 vs. RMEBX (25.00). GCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: GCLSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.88 vs. GCLSX (3.05). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 40.75 vs. GCLSX (11.03).
| GCLSX | RMEBX | GCLSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.382 | 4.809 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 557M | 105B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 1.54 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.05 | 10.88 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.79 | 19.18 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.03 | 40.75 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.71 | 63.29 | 77% |