Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCLSX vs RMEBX
GCLSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCLSX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts Svc
Price$25.50
Change-$0.12 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets565.19M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.45
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
GCLSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCLSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCLSX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. GCLSX (565M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GCLSX: RMEBX (1.05) vs GCLSX (0.66). GCLSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCLSX (27 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GCLSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). GCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: GCLSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.96 vs. GCLSX (-2.59). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 58.09 vs. GCLSX (30.26).
| GCLSX | RMEBX | GCLSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.07 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.07 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.374 | 14.628 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 565M | 113B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 1.05 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.59 | 7.96 | -33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.31 | 43.02 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.26 | 58.09 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.71 | 92.06 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement