Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCLSX vs RMEBX
GCLSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCLSX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts Svc
Price$25.50
Change+$0.39 (+1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets572.69M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.74
Change+$0.52 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.66B
GCLSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCLSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCLSX is a Buy and RMEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. GCLSX (573M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GCLSX: RMEBX (1.05) vs GCLSX (0.66). GCLSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCLSX (27 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GCLSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). GCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: GCLSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.73 vs. GCLSX (-7.08). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 49.78 vs. GCLSX (24.62).
| GCLSX | RMEBX | GCLSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.07 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.07 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.857 | 13.325 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 573M | 110B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 1.05 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.08 | 4.73 | -150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.32 | 25.82 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.62 | 49.78 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.48 | 84.34 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers