Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCLSX vs RMEBX
GCLSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCLSX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts Svc
Price$24.13
Change+$0.06 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets525.02M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$58.73
Change+$0.13 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets107.25B
GCLSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCLSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCLSX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 107B vs. GCLSX (525M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GCLSX: RMEBX (1.16) vs GCLSX (0.72). GCLSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCLSX (27 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GCLSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). GCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: GCLSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.78 vs. GCLSX (-0.87). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 63.07 vs. GCLSX (37.42).
| GCLSX | RMEBX | GCLSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.07 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.07 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.505 | 7.553 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 525M | 107B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 1.16 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.87 | 9.78 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.17 | 27.29 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.42 | 63.07 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.75 | 74.66 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers