Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCLSX vs RMEBX
GCLSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCLSX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts Svc
Price$24.14
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets527.47M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.72
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.54B
GCLSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCLSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCLSX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. GCLSX (527M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GCLSX: RMEBX (1.11) vs GCLSX (0.75). GCLSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCLSX (27 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GCLSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). GCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: GCLSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.55 vs. GCLSX (-1.49). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.24 vs. GCLSX (25.72).
| GCLSX | RMEBX | GCLSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.07 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.07 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.779 | 9.366 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 527M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.11 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.49 | 10.55 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.11 | 25.15 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.72 | 53.24 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.08 | 77.07 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement