Ad is loading...
GCLSX vs RMEBX
GCLSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCLSX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts Svc
Price$23.36
Change+$0.21 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets542.06M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$56.01
Change+$0.46 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets101.47B
GCLSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCLSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCLSX is a Buy and RMEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. GCLSX (542M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GCLSX: RMEBX (1.15) vs GCLSX (0.68). GCLSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCLSX (26 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GCLSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). GCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: GCLSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.74 vs. GCLSX (-6.93). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 76.98 vs. GCLSX (56.44).
| GCLSX | RMEBX | GCLSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.07 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.07 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.699 | 2.299 | -30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 542M | 101B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 1.15 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.93 | 4.74 | -146% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.07 | 10.55 | -1% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.44 | 76.98 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.83 | 63.47 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...