Ad is loading...
GCLSX vs RMEBX
GCLSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCLSX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts Svc
Price$23.04
Change+$0.17 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets512.62M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$55.41
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.91B
GCLSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCLSX vs. RMEBX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCLSX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. GCLSX (513M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GCLSX: RMEBX (1.21) vs GCLSX (0.75). GCLSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCLSX (26 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GCLSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). GCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: GCLSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.19 vs. GCLSX (-5.65). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.02 vs. GCLSX (31.47).
| GCLSX | RMEBX | GCLSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.07 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.07 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.900 | 1.203 | -158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 513M | 101B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.21 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.65 | 5.19 | -109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.47 | 16.77 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.47 | 55.02 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.55 | 58.89 | 74% |