Ad is loading...
GCLSX vs RMEBX
GCLSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCLSX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts Svc
Price$24.05
Change+$0.14 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets528.42M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$56.08
Change+$0.30 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.85B
GCLSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCLSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jan 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCLSX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. GCLSX (528M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GCLSX: RMEBX (1.54) vs GCLSX (0.88). GCLSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCLSX (26 years) vs RMEBX (10 years). GCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 208.00 vs. RMEBX (25.00). GCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: GCLSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.29 vs. GCLSX (7.35). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.84 vs. GCLSX (9.44).
| GCLSX | RMEBX | GCLSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.354 | 2.149 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 528M | 103B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 1.54 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.35 | 12.29 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.44 | 12.11 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.44 | 36.84 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.77 | 63.72 | 83% |