Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCLSX vs RMEBX
GCLSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCLSX vs RMEBX
GCLSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCLSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCLSX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. GCLSX (775M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GCLSX: RMEBX (0.99) vs GCLSX (0.51). GCLSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCLSX (28 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). GCLSX (1.13) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 213.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). GCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: GCLSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). GCLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.15 vs. RMEBX (9.66). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.72 vs. GCLSX (17.12).
| GCLSX | RMEBX | GCLSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.07 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 1.07 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.584 | 11.521 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 775M | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.99 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.15 | 9.66 | 240% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.46 | 38.05 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.12 | 36.72 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.43 | 93.11 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement