Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCLSX vs RMEBX
GCLSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCLSX vs RMEBX
GCLSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCLSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCLSX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. GCLSX (755M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GCLSX: RMEBX (0.99) vs GCLSX (0.50). GCLSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCLSX (28 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). GCLSX (1.13) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 213.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). GCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: GCLSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). GCLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.28 vs. RMEBX (4.66). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.28 vs. GCLSX (15.22).
| GCLSX | RMEBX | GCLSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.07 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 1.07 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.741 | 8.108 | 219% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 755M | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.99 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.28 | 4.66 | 349% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.07 | 34.17 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.22 | 33.28 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.87 | 91.58 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers