Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCLSX vs RMEBX
GCLSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCLSX vs RMEBX
GCLSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCLSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCLSX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. GCLSX (693M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GCLSX: RMEBX (1.04) vs GCLSX (0.66). GCLSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCLSX (27 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). GCLSX (1.13) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 213.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). GCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: GCLSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). GCLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.35 vs. RMEBX (9.98). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.93 vs. GCLSX (8.08).
| GCLSX | RMEBX | GCLSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.07 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 1.07 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.940 | 5.801 | 171% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 693M | 115B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 1.04 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.35 | 9.98 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.93 | 34.14 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.08 | 32.93 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.47 | 89.84 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement