Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCLSX vs RMFCX
GCLSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GCLSX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts Svc
Price$25.50
Change-$0.12 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets565.19M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.10
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
GCLSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCLSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCLSX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. GCLSX (565M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GCLSX: RMFCX (1.20) vs GCLSX (0.66). GCLSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GCLSX (27 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GCLSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). GCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: GCLSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.11 vs. GCLSX (-2.59). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.28 vs. GCLSX (30.26).
| GCLSX | RMFCX | GCLSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.91 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.91 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.374 | 14.779 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 565M | 113B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 1.20 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.59 | 8.11 | -32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.31 | 43.61 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.26 | 59.28 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.71 | 93.90 | 74% |