Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCLSX vs RMFCX
GCLSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GCLSX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts Svc
Price$24.14
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets527.47M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.40
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.54B
GCLSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCLSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCLSX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. GCLSX (527M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GCLSX: RMFCX (1.26) vs GCLSX (0.75). GCLSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GCLSX (27 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GCLSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). GCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: GCLSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.70 vs. GCLSX (-1.49). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.40 vs. GCLSX (25.72).
| GCLSX | RMFCX | GCLSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.91 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.91 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.779 | 9.486 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 527M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.26 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.49 | 10.70 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.11 | 25.70 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.72 | 54.40 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.08 | 78.69 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement