Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCLSX vs RMFCX
GCLSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GCLSX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts Svc
Price$25.09
Change-$0.14 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets550.28M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.11
Change-$0.10 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.45B
GCLSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCLSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCLSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. GCLSX (550M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GCLSX: RMFCX (1.24) vs GCLSX (0.72). GCLSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GCLSX (27 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GCLSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). GCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: GCLSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.48 vs. GCLSX (-4.68). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 55.53 vs. GCLSX (30.54).
| GCLSX | RMFCX | GCLSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.91 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.91 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.510 | 10.795 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 550M | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 1.24 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.68 | 6.48 | -72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.81 | 30.98 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.54 | 55.53 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.78 | 94.43 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement