Ad is loading...
GCLSX vs RMFCX
GCLSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GCLSX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts Svc
Price$23.04
Change+$0.17 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets512.62M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.11
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.63B
GCLSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCLSX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCLSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. GCLSX (513M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GCLSX: RMFCX (1.37) vs GCLSX (0.75). GCLSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GCLSX (26 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GCLSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). GCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: GCLSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.35 vs. GCLSX (-5.65). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.16 vs. GCLSX (31.47).
| GCLSX | RMFCX | GCLSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.91 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.91 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.900 | 1.270 | -150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 513M | 101B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.37 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.65 | 5.35 | -106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.47 | 17.29 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.47 | 56.16 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.55 | 60.33 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...