Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCLSX vs RMFCX
GCLSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GCLSX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts Svc
Price$25.50
Change+$0.39 (+1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets572.69M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.89
Change+$0.50 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.66B
GCLSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCLSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCLSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. GCLSX (573M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GCLSX: RMFCX (1.21) vs GCLSX (0.66). GCLSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GCLSX (27 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GCLSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). GCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: GCLSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.64 vs. GCLSX (-7.08). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.34 vs. GCLSX (24.62).
| GCLSX | RMFCX | GCLSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.91 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.91 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.857 | 12.543 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 573M | 110B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 1.21 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.08 | 4.64 | -153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.32 | 26.06 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.62 | 52.34 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.48 | 84.44 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement