Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCLSX vs RMFCX
GCLSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GCLSX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts Svc
Price$23.59
Change-$0.04 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets515.73M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.33
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.31B
GCLSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCLSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCLSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. GCLSX (516M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GCLSX: RMFCX (1.31) vs GCLSX (0.72). GCLSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GCLSX (26 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GCLSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). GCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: GCLSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.44 vs. GCLSX (-3.07). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 50.95 vs. GCLSX (22.00).
| GCLSX | RMFCX | GCLSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.91 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.91 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.360 | 5.423 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 516M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 1.31 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.07 | 8.44 | -36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.80 | 18.47 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.00 | 50.95 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.31 | 69.73 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement