Ad is loading...
GCLSX vs RMFCX
GCLSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GCLSX vs RMFCX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts Svc
Price$23.36
Change+$0.21 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets542.06M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.69
Change+$0.45 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets101.47B
GCLSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCLSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCLSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. GCLSX (542M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GCLSX: RMFCX (1.30) vs GCLSX (0.68). GCLSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GCLSX (26 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). GCLSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). GCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: GCLSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.86 vs. GCLSX (-6.93). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 78.24 vs. GCLSX (56.44).
| GCLSX | RMFCX | GCLSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.91 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.91 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.699 | 2.336 | -30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 542M | 101B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 1.30 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.93 | 4.86 | -143% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.07 | 11.01 | -1% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.44 | 78.24 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.83 | 64.93 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers