Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCLSX vs RMFCX
GCLSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GCLSX vs RMFCX
GCLSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCLSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCLSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. GCLSX (749M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GCLSX: RMFCX (1.16) vs GCLSX (0.53). GCLSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GCLSX (28 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). GCLSX (1.13) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 213.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). GCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: GCLSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). GCLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.63 vs. RMFCX (7.69). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.08 vs. GCLSX (14.88).
| GCLSX | RMFCX | GCLSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.91 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.91 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.458 | 9.325 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 749M | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 1.16 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.63 | 7.69 | 229% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.55 | 32.42 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.88 | 37.08 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.47 | 91.03 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement