Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCLSX vs RMFCX
GCLSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GCLSX vs RMFCX
GCLSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCLSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCLSX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. GCLSX (755M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GCLSX: RMFCX (1.15) vs GCLSX (0.50). GCLSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GCLSX (28 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). GCLSX (1.13) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 213.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). GCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: GCLSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). GCLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.28 vs. RMFCX (4.78). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.21 vs. GCLSX (15.22).
| GCLSX | RMFCX | GCLSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.91 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.91 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.741 | 8.214 | 216% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 755M | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.15 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.28 | 4.78 | 341% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.07 | 34.72 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.22 | 34.21 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.87 | 93.42 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement