Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCLSX vs RMFEX
GCLSX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts GCLSX vs RMFEX
GCLSX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCLSX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCLSX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. GCLSX (775M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than GCLSX: RMFEX (1.41) vs GCLSX (0.51). GCLSX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: GCLSX (28 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). GCLSX (1.13) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). GCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 213.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). GCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: GCLSX (0) vs RMFEX (250). GCLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.15 vs. RMFEX (10.16). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.85 vs. GCLSX (17.12).
| GCLSX | RMFEX | GCLSX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.62 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.62 | 182% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.584 | 11.820 | 174% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 775M | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 1.41 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.15 | 10.16 | 228% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.46 | 39.94 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.12 | 39.85 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.43 | 103.13 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers