Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCLSX vs RMFEX
GCLSX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts GCLSX vs RMFEX
GCLSX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCLSX vs. RMFEX commentary
Sep 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCLSX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. GCLSX (755M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than GCLSX: RMFEX (1.41) vs GCLSX (0.50). GCLSX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: GCLSX (28 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). GCLSX (1.13) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). GCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 213.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). GCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: GCLSX (0) vs RMFEX (250). GCLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.28 vs. RMFEX (5.12). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 36.33 vs. GCLSX (15.22).
| GCLSX | RMFEX | GCLSX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.62 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.62 | 182% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.741 | 8.435 | 210% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 755M | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.41 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.28 | 5.12 | 318% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.07 | 36.00 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.22 | 36.33 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.87 | 101.75 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement