GCMG
Price
$12.27
Change
-$0.12 (-0.97%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
653.01M
38 days until earnings call
OWL
Price
$17.76
Change
+$0.40 (+2.30%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
11.56B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GCMG vs OWL

Header iconGCMG vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts GCMG vs OWLBanner chart's image
GCM Grosvenor
Price$12.27
Change-$0.12 (-0.97%)
Volume$583.26K
Capitalization653.01M
Blue Owl Capital
Price$17.76
Change+$0.40 (+2.30%)
Volume$7.31M
Capitalization11.56B
GCMG vs OWL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GCMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GCMG vs. OWL commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCMG is a Buy and OWL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GCMG: $12.27 vs. OWL: $17.76)
Brand notoriety: GCMG and OWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GCMG: 101% vs. OWL: 94%
Market capitalization -- GCMG: $653.01M vs. OWL: $11.56B
GCMG [@Investment Managers] is valued at $653.01M. OWL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $11.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GCMG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GCMG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GCMG is a better buy in the long-term than OWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GCMG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GCMG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OWL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GCMG is a better buy in the short-term than OWL.

Price Growth

GCMG (@Investment Managers) experienced а -5.32% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was -6.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

GCMG is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

OWL is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.00% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OWL($11.6B) has a higher market cap than GCMG($653M). OWL has higher P/E ratio than GCMG: OWL (161.45) vs GCMG (68.17). GCMG YTD gains are higher at: 2.547 vs. OWL (-21.312). OWL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 804M vs. GCMG (122M). GCMG has more cash in the bank: 136M vs. OWL (118M). GCMG has less debt than OWL: GCMG (484M) vs OWL (3.65B). OWL has higher revenues than GCMG: OWL (2.62B) vs GCMG (544M).
GCMGOWLGCMG / OWL
Capitalization653M11.6B6%
EBITDA122M804M15%
Gain YTD2.547-21.312-12%
P/E Ratio68.17161.4542%
Revenue544M2.62B21%
Total Cash136M118M115%
Total Debt484M3.65B13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GCMG: Fundamental Ratings
GCMG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
77
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
75
SMR RATING
1..100
6
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GCMGOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GCMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TPVIX19.950.18
+0.91%
Timothy Plan Small Cap Value I
BRZKX13.390.12
+0.90%
BlackRock Sust Aware Adg Intl Eq K
TAGRX71.790.39
+0.55%
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core A
GMNPX38.450.13
+0.34%
Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infras P
HLMGX36.780.07
+0.19%
Harding Loevner Global Equity Advisor

GCMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GCMG has been loosely correlated with OWL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GCMG jumps, then OWL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCMG
1D Price
Change %
GCMG100%
-0.97%
OWL - GCMG
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.30%
STEP - GCMG
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
BAM - GCMG
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
EQH - GCMG
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
ARES - GCMG
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
More