GCMG
Price
$13.60
Change
-$0.08 (-0.58%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
821.21M
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OWL
Price
$9.29
Change
-$0.07 (-0.75%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
6.28B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GCMG vs OWL

GCMG vs OWL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GCMG vs. OWL commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCMG is a Buy and OWL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (GCMG: $13.60 vs. OWL: $9.29)
Brand notoriety: GCMG and OWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GCMG: 42% vs. OWL: 52%
Market capitalization -- GCMG: $821.21M vs. OWL: $6.28B
GCMG [@Investment Managers] is valued at $821.21M. OWL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $6.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $159.89B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GCMG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GCMG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GCMG is a better buy in the long-term than OWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GCMG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GCMG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OWL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GCMG is a better buy in the short-term than OWL.

Price Growth

GCMG (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.07% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

GCMG is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

OWL is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.61% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OWL($6.28B) has a higher market cap than GCMG($821M). OWL has higher P/E ratio than GCMG: OWL (77.42) vs GCMG (27.20). GCMG YTD gains are higher at: 22.782 vs. OWL (-35.093). OWL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 951M vs. GCMG (200M). OWL has more cash in the bank: 190M vs. GCMG (164M). GCMG has less debt than OWL: GCMG (414M) vs OWL (4.36B). OWL has higher revenues than GCMG: OWL (2.94B) vs GCMG (567M).
GCMGOWLGCMG / OWL
Capitalization821M6.28B13%
EBITDA200M951M21%
Gain YTD22.782-35.093-65%
P/E Ratio27.2077.4235%
Revenue567M2.94B19%
Total Cash164M190M86%
Total Debt414M4.36B10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GCMG: Fundamental Ratings
GCMG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
37
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
40
SMR RATING
1..100
4
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
11

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GCMGOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GCMG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OWL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MKTN26.470.14
+0.53%
Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral ETF
MSFU23.47N/A
N/A
Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares
MVFG34.59-0.13
-0.37%
Monarch Volume Factor Gbl Uncons ETF
OP.X0.098156-0.002009
-2.01%
Optimism cryptocurrency
QLVE32.68-0.80
-2.40%
FlexShares EMs Quality Lw Vol ETF

GCMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GCMG has been loosely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GCMG jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCMG
1D Price
Change %
GCMG100%
-0.58%
ARES - GCMG
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
SCM - GCMG
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.04%
BLK - GCMG
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
OWL - GCMG
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
TPG - GCMG
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
More