Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCSSX vs NAESX
GCSSX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts GCSSX vs NAESX
GCSSX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCSSX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCSSX is a Buy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. GCSSX (1.1B). NAESX pays higher dividends than GCSSX: NAESX (1.09) vs GCSSX (0.29). GCSSX was incepted earlier than NAESX: GCSSX (29 years) vs NAESX (66 years). GCSSX (1.43) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). GCSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 162.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). GCSSX (0) and NAESX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.09 vs. GCSSX (11.91). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. GCSSX (-3.68).
| GCSSX | NAESX | GCSSX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.17 | 794% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.17 | 841% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.321 | 12.982 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 185B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 1.09 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.91 | 13.09 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.58 | 49.57 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.68 | 32.77 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.59 | 152.60 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement