Ad is loading...
GCVAX vs RMEBX
GCVAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCVAX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts A
Price$22.05
Change+$1.55 (+7.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets481.96M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$53.86
Change+$3.35 (+6.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.3B
GCVAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCVAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCVAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 98.3B vs. GCVAX (482M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GCVAX: RMEBX (1.18) vs GCVAX (0.86). GCVAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCVAX (26 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) and GCVAX (1.02) have similar cost to investors . GCVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCVAX: RMEBX (250) vs GCVAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.56 vs. GCVAX (-15.93). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 44.36 vs. GCVAX (21.38).
| GCVAX | RMEBX | GCVAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.07 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.07 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.393 | -7.747 | 147% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 482M | 98.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.18 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.93 | -4.56 | 350% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.70 | -1.07 | 996% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.38 | 44.36 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.12 | 44.99 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...