Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCVAX vs RMEBX
GCVAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCVAX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts A
Price$25.19
Change-$0.04 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets556.11M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.53
Change-$0.04 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
GCVAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCVAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCVAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. GCVAX (556M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GCVAX: RMEBX (1.09) vs GCVAX (0.85). GCVAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCVAX (27 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) and GCVAX (1.02) have similar cost to investors . GCVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCVAX: RMEBX (250) vs GCVAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.63 vs. GCVAX (-3.38). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 57.72 vs. GCVAX (32.51).
| GCVAX | RMEBX | GCVAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.07 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.07 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.381 | 12.681 | 74% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 556M | 111B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.09 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.38 | 6.63 | -51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.10 | 33.39 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.51 | 57.72 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.05 | 94.26 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement