Ad is loading...
GCVAX vs RMEBX
GCVAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCVAX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts A
Price$22.88
Change+$0.17 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets512.62M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$55.41
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.91B
GCVAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCVAX vs. RMEBX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCVAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. GCVAX (513M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GCVAX: RMEBX (1.21) vs GCVAX (0.89). GCVAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCVAX (26 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) and GCVAX (1.02) have similar cost to investors . GCVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCVAX: RMEBX (250) vs GCVAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.19 vs. GCVAX (-5.56). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.02 vs. GCVAX (32.00).
| GCVAX | RMEBX | GCVAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.07 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.07 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.841 | 1.203 | -153% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 513M | 101B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 1.21 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.56 | 5.19 | -107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.84 | 16.77 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.00 | 55.02 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.65 | 58.89 | 76% |