Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCVAX vs RMEBX
GCVAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCVAX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts A
Price$23.47
Change-$0.07 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets519.04M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.68
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.31B
GCVAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCVAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCVAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. GCVAX (519M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GCVAX: RMEBX (1.16) vs GCVAX (0.85). GCVAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCVAX (26 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) and GCVAX (1.02) have similar cost to investors . GCVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCVAX: RMEBX (250) vs GCVAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.97 vs. GCVAX (-2.11). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 49.85 vs. GCVAX (22.89).
| GCVAX | RMEBX | GCVAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.07 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.07 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.746 | 5.349 | 33% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 519M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.16 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.11 | 8.97 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.68 | 18.03 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.89 | 49.85 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.07 | 67.40 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement