Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCVCX vs RMEBX
GCVCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCVCX vs RMEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts C
Price$24.98
Change-$0.11 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets565.19M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.45
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
GCVCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCVCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCVCX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. GCVCX (565M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GCVCX: RMEBX (1.05) vs GCVCX (0.17). GCVCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCVCX (27 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). GCVCX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GCVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 206.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCVCX: RMEBX (250) vs GCVCX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.96 vs. GCVCX (-3.45). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 58.09 vs. GCVCX (25.74).
| GCVCX | RMEBX | GCVCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.07 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.07 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.788 | 14.628 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 565M | 113B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 1.05 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.45 | 7.96 | -43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.46 | 43.02 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.74 | 58.09 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.53 | 92.06 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers