Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCVCX vs RMEBX
GCVCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCVCX vs RMEBX
GCVCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCVCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCVCX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. GCVCX (723M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GCVCX: RMEBX (1.04) vs GCVCX (0.15). GCVCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCVCX (27 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). GCVCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GCVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 213.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCVCX: RMEBX (250) vs GCVCX (1000). GCVCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.01 vs. RMEBX (9.11). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.74 vs. GCVCX (8.89).
| GCVCX | RMEBX | GCVCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.07 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.07 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.294 | 6.308 | 195% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 723M | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 1.04 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.01 | 9.11 | 209% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.97 | 34.37 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.89 | 34.74 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.95 | 94.33 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement