Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCVIX vs RMEBX
GCVIX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCVIX vs RMEBX
GCVIX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCVIX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCVIX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. GCVIX (751M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GCVIX: RMEBX (0.99) vs GCVIX (0.92). GCVIX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCVIX (28 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than GCVIX (0.63). GCVIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 213.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCVIX: RMEBX (250) vs GCVIX (1000000). GCVIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.91 vs. RMEBX (3.28). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.43 vs. GCVIX (18.34).
| GCVIX | RMEBX | GCVIX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.07 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.704 | 7.309 | 229% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 751M | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.99 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.91 | 3.28 | 455% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.81 | 36.11 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.34 | 34.43 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.46 | 87.89 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers