Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCVIX vs RMEBX
GCVIX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCVIX vs RMEBX
GCVIX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCVIX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCVIX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. GCVIX (723M). GCVIX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: GCVIX (1.10) vs RMEBX (1.04). GCVIX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCVIX (27 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than GCVIX (0.63). GCVIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 213.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCVIX: RMEBX (250) vs GCVIX (1000000). GCVIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.43 vs. RMEBX (9.11). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.74 vs. GCVIX (15.64).
| GCVIX | RMEBX | GCVIX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.07 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.884 | 6.308 | 204% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 723M | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.04 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.43 | 9.11 | 224% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.79 | 34.37 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.64 | 34.74 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.31 | 94.33 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement