Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCVIX vs RMFCX
GCVIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GCVIX vs RMFCX
GCVIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCVIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCVIX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. GCVIX (751M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GCVIX: RMFCX (1.15) vs GCVIX (0.92). GCVIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GCVIX (28 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than GCVIX (0.63). GCVIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 213.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCVIX: RMFCX (250) vs GCVIX (1000000). GCVIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.91 vs. RMFCX (4.16). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.35 vs. GCVIX (18.34).
| GCVIX | RMFCX | GCVIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.91 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.704 | 8.188 | 204% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 751M | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 1.15 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.91 | 4.16 | 359% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.81 | 37.64 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.34 | 36.35 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.46 | 91.05 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers