Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCVRX vs RMEBX
GCVRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCVRX vs RMEBX
GCVRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCVRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCVRX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. GCVRX (749M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GCVRX: RMEBX (0.99) vs GCVRX (0.43). GCVRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCVRX (19 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). GCVRX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). GCVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 213.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). GCVRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: GCVRX (0) vs RMEBX (250). GCVRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.41 vs. RMEBX (4.65). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.68 vs. GCVRX (13.88).
| GCVRX | RMEBX | GCVRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.07 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.07 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.670 | 8.448 | 197% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 749M | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.99 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.41 | 4.65 | 310% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.97 | 34.88 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.88 | 34.68 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.05 | 92.45 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement