Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCVRX vs RMFCX
GCVRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GCVRX vs RMFCX
GCVRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCVRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCVRX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. GCVRX (758M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GCVRX: RMFCX (1.16) vs GCVRX (0.45). GCVRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GCVRX (19 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). GCVRX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GCVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 213.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). GCVRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: GCVRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). GCVRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.91 vs. RMFCX (8.22). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.01 vs. GCVRX (14.02).
| GCVRX | RMFCX | GCVRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.91 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.91 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.588 | 9.445 | 176% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 758M | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 1.16 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.91 | 8.22 | 242% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.06 | 32.65 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.02 | 37.01 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.25 | 91.39 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement