Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCVRX vs RMFCX
GCVRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts GCVRX vs RMFCX
GCVRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCVRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCVRX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. GCVRX (734M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than GCVRX: RMFCX (1.16) vs GCVRX (0.45). GCVRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: GCVRX (19 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). GCVRX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). GCVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 213.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). GCVRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: GCVRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). GCVRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.16 vs. RMFCX (8.82). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.36 vs. GCVRX (12.42).
| GCVRX | RMFCX | GCVRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.91 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.91 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.957 | 9.462 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 734M | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 1.16 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.16 | 8.82 | 195% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.20 | 36.31 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.42 | 37.36 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.95 | 92.46 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers