Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCVTX vs RMEBX
GCVTX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCVTX vs RMEBX
GCVTX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCVTX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCVTX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. GCVTX (723M). RMEBX (1.04) and GCVTX (1.01) have matching dividends . GCVTX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCVTX (19 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than GCVTX (0.74). GCVTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 213.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). GCVTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: GCVTX (0) vs RMEBX (250). GCVTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.30 vs. RMEBX (9.11). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.74 vs. GCVTX (14.82).
| GCVTX | RMEBX | GCVTX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.07 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.07 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.831 | 6.308 | 203% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 723M | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 1.04 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.30 | 9.11 | 223% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.23 | 34.37 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.82 | 34.74 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.97 | 94.33 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement