Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GCVTX vs RMEBX
GCVTX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GCVTX vs RMEBX
GCVTX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GCVTX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCVTX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. GCVTX (749M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GCVTX: RMEBX (0.99) vs GCVTX (0.85). GCVTX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GCVTX (19 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than GCVTX (0.74). GCVTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 213.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). GCVTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: GCVTX (0) vs RMEBX (250). GCVTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.99 vs. RMEBX (4.65). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.68 vs. GCVTX (16.99).
| GCVTX | RMEBX | GCVTX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.07 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.07 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.086 | 8.448 | 202% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 749M | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 0.99 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.99 | 4.65 | 322% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.08 | 34.88 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.99 | 34.68 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.74 | 92.45 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement