Ad is loading...
GDIV vs RECS
GDIV vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts GDIV vs RECS
Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF
Price$13.97
Change-$0.70 (-4.77%)
Volume$67.8K
Net Assets243.18M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$31.85
Change-$1.73 (-5.15%)
Volume$748.36K
Net Assets2.29B
GDIV vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GDIV vs. RECS commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDIV is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.29B vs. GDIV (243M). RECS (-8.001) and GDIV (-8.110) have matching annual dividend yield . GDIV was incepted earlier than RECS: GDIV (12 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than GDIV (0.50). GDIV has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| GDIV | RECS | GDIV / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | -8.110 | -8.001 | 101% |
| Net Assets | 243M | 2.29B | 11% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.15 | 333% |
| Turnover | 58.00 | 49.00 | 118% |
| Yield | 1.36 | 0.73 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GDIV | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 73% | 8 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GDIV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDIV has been loosely correlated with MCHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GDIV jumps, then MCHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GDIV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDIV | 100% | -4.78% | ||
| MCHP - GDIV | 66% Loosely correlated | -16.80% | ||
| CE - GDIV | 66% Loosely correlated | -16.58% | ||
| BLK - GDIV | 63% Loosely correlated | -7.71% | ||
| BN - GDIV | 62% Loosely correlated | -7.41% | ||
| AMP - GDIV | 62% Loosely correlated | -7.80% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -5.15% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -8.98% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -6.05% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -2.36% | ||
| CR - RECS | 65% Loosely correlated | -7.43% | ||
| JHG - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | -11.05% | ||
More | ||||