GDX
Price
$77.09
Change
-$4.24 (-5.21%)
Updated
Oct 30 closing price
Net Assets
25.59B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SLVP
Price
$28.96
Change
-$1.77 (-5.76%)
Updated
Oct 30 closing price
Net Assets
791.21M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GDX vs SLVP

GDX vs SLVP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 21, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) vs. iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP)

Key Takeaways

  • VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) provides broad exposure to global gold and silver mining companies through a market-cap-weighted index with approximately 60 holdings, while iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) focuses more narrowly on silver mining firms with around 36 holdings.
  • GDX carries a net expense ratio of 0.51 percent, reflecting its larger scale and liquidity, whereas SLVP offers a lower expense ratio of 0.39 percent, potentially enhancing cost efficiency for investors seeking silver-centric exposure.
  • Both ETFs employ passive strategies tracking established indices, with GDX emphasizing major gold producers such as Newmont Corp (NEM) and Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd (AEM), and SLVP concentrating on silver specialists including Hecla Mining Co (HL) and First Majestic Silver Corp (AG).
  • GDX offers greater diversification across gold and silver miners with top holdings representing roughly 59 percent of assets, compared to SLVP's more concentrated portfolio where the top 10 positions often exceed 70 percent.
  • In the precious metals mining sector, GDX benefits from higher trading volume and structural liquidity, while SLVP provides targeted sensitivity to silver price dynamics and related metals.
  • Structural differences position GDX as a core holding for broad precious metals equity exposure and SLVP as a complementary or alternative vehicle for investors prioritizing silver mining themes.

Introduction

Precious metals mining equities have drawn renewed investor attention amid fluctuating commodity prices and macroeconomic uncertainty. VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) do not compete directly but serve as alternative vehicles within the same sector, delivering equity exposure to companies involved in gold and silver extraction. GDX delivers broader coverage of gold-focused miners with ancillary silver exposure, while SLVP targets silver mining operations more specifically. Comparing the two helps investors evaluate trade-offs in diversification, cost, and thematic emphasis when constructing portfolios sensitive to precious metals trends.

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) Overview

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) seeks to replicate the performance of the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index before fees and expenses. The fund holds approximately 60 securities and follows a passive, market-capitalization-weighted methodology with quarterly rebalancing. Top holdings typically include Newmont Corp (NEM), Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd (AEM), Barrick Mining Corp (B), Wheaton Precious Metals Corp (WPM), and Franco-Nevada Corp (FNV), with the top 10 positions accounting for roughly 59 percent of assets. The portfolio allocates primarily to the materials sector, focusing on gold mining activities globally, with meaningful exposure to Canada, the United States, and other developed markets. Its net expense ratio stands at 0.51 percent. The ETF structure provides high liquidity and options availability, distinguishing it as a liquid vehicle for broad precious metals miners exposure.

iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) Overview

iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) tracks the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners IMI Index, targeting companies primarily engaged in silver mining. The fund maintains around 36 holdings and employs a passive, market-capitalization-weighted approach. Prominent positions often feature Hecla Mining Co (HL), Industrias Penoles SAB de CV, First Majestic Silver Corp (AG), Fresnillo PLC (FRES), and Aya Gold & Silver Inc (AYA), with the top 10 frequently comprising over 70 percent of the portfolio. Allocation centers almost entirely on the metals and mining sector. Its net expense ratio is 0.39 percent. The ETF offers semi-annual distributions and focuses on developed and emerging markets with significant Canadian and Mexican exposure, providing a more concentrated vehicle for silver mining themes.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The precious metals mining sector responds to gold and silver price movements, global economic conditions, interest rate expectations, and supply dynamics. Capital flows into mining equities often accelerate during periods of monetary easing or heightened geopolitical risk, while regulatory developments in major producing regions can influence operational costs. Both ETFs operate within this environment, where commodity trends and corporate earnings from key producers drive relative performance. Broader sector risks include input cost inflation, environmental regulations, and reserve depletion, which can affect long-term production profiles across gold and silver miners.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, both ETFs have exhibited volatility tied to commodity price swings and sector rotation. GDX, with its larger gold emphasis and greater diversification, has tended to show more stable relative behavior during gold price rallies, supported by its scale and liquidity profile. SLVP has displayed heightened sensitivity to silver price movements, leading to potentially sharper swings in periods of silver-specific demand shifts. In recent weeks and months, positioning has reflected broader precious metals momentum, with differences in holdings concentration influencing how each fund captures earnings cycles from top producers. Investors evaluating relative positioning often note GDX's broader liquidity advantages alongside SLVP's lower cost structure for targeted silver exposure.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including lower expense ratio, focused silver exposure, and competitive diversification within its niche, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probabilistic preference to iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) for investors seeking cost-efficient thematic positioning, while recognizing VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) as a strong alternative for broader liquidity and gold-centric coverage.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GDX vs. SLVP commentary
Oct 31, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GDX is a Hold and SLVP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for GDX with price predictions
Oct 30, 2026

GDX in downward trend: price dove below 50-day moving average on September 28, 2026

GDX moved below its 50-day moving average on September 28, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 34 of 38 similar past instances, the stock price decreased further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 89%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 29, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on GDX as a result. In 69 of 78 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for GDX turned negative on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 49 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 40 of the 49 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 82%.

The 10-day moving average for GDX crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 02, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 9 of 12 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 75%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where GDX declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.

The Aroon Indicator for GDX entered a downward trend on October 30, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator is in the oversold zone. Keep an eye out for a move up in the foreseeable future.

The 50-day moving average for GDX moved above the 200-day moving average on October 01, 2026. This could be a long-term bullish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an upward trend.

Following a +3.62% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where GDX advanced for three days, in 290 of 317 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

GDX may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for SLVP with price predictions
Oct 30, 2026

SLVP in downward trend: 10-day moving average broke below 50-day moving average on October 02, 2026

The 10-day moving average for SLVP crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 02, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 12 of 13 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

SLVP moved below its 50-day moving average on September 28, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

The 50-day moving average for SLVP moved below the 200-day moving average on October 30, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where SLVP declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 87%.

The Aroon Indicator for SLVP entered a downward trend on October 30, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator entered the oversold zone -- be on the watch for SLVP's price rising or consolidating in the future. That's also the time to consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

The Stochastic Oscillator is in the oversold zone. Keep an eye out for a move up in the foreseeable future.

Following a +3.98% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where SLVP advanced for three days, in 286 of 309 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

SLVP may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GDXSLVP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
GDX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SLVP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement

GDX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDX has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 96% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GDX jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDX
1D Price
Change %
GDX100%
-5.21%
WPM - GDX
96%
Closely correlated
-5.42%
AEM - GDX
95%
Closely correlated
-5.99%
KGC - GDX
93%
Closely correlated
-6.81%
IAG - GDX
93%
Closely correlated
-7.71%
NEM - GDX
93%
Closely correlated
-4.64%
More

SLVP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLVP has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLVP jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLVP
1D Price
Change %
SLVP100%
-5.76%
PAAS - SLVP
93%
Closely correlated
-6.80%
WPM - SLVP
92%
Closely correlated
-5.42%
AEM - SLVP
91%
Closely correlated
-5.99%
NEM - SLVP
90%
Closely correlated
-4.64%
SKE - SLVP
90%
Closely correlated
-5.30%
More
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XOP203.764.24
+2.13%
State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP)
PJP130.541.66
+1.29%
Invesco Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP)
NETL23.87-0.07
-0.29%
Colterpoint Net Lease Real Estate ETF (NETL)
VSMV62.69-0.33
-0.52%
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV)
HOYY3.99-0.21
-5.00%
GraniteShares YieldBOOST HOOD ETF (HOYY)